The True Cost

The environment is probably one of the hottest topics AFTER the financial crisis.
But even though we working about the environment and talk about it endlessly, as a country we still do not DO as much as we talk.
Australian's still have a fascination and desire for their own house on their own block of land. The fastest growing areas in New South Wales are in the outer suburbs and are dominated by the McMansions.
A McMansion often denotes a home with a larger footprint than a median home, an
indistinct architectural style similar to others nearby, and is often located in
a newer, larger subdivision or replaces an existing, smaller structure in an older neighborhood. Wiki
It's this very specific push for McMansions on their own blocks which is actually costing the country more both economically and environmentally.
Yes that's 85 Million dollars.
But that's really only the indirect costs and does not take into count the millions, no billions that these massive houses in outer suburbs will indirectly and directly cost over the the next 50 years.
Australia is in the midst of many crisis's, water we know about, but the energy crisis will soon be here too.
These huge houses costs a bomb energy wise because in the main they are not built to be energy efficient. They use air conditioning for cooling, they are not designed for the Australian Climate (even though their builders would disagree) and they are made to the lowest common cost.
This all sums up to their need for significant power for heating, cooling, lighting and living. Yes you can reduce the energy consumption by using energy efficient appliances and light fittings, but it's far harder to retrofit a McMansion to have overhanging eaves to prevent direct sun in summer, or improve natural air flow etc.
I think as a society we have to seriously look at our environmental foot print and the government needs to discourage the outer suburb McMansion, OR find ways to significantly reduce the impact through shared co generation power plants for each new sub division, public Transport, better environmental building standards etc.
I think though that since public transport costs billions and realistically we are unlikely to stop McMansions we need to concentrate on other ways to reduce the impact.
Labels: Architecture, Environment


